← Back to Architecture Deep Dives

Scaling AI Systems in Production

Deploying LLM-based systems that work in demos is one thing; scaling them to handle production workloads with reliability, cost efficiency, and low latency is another. This guide covers practical approaches to scaling AI systems.

Understanding the Bottlenecks

LLM systems have different bottlenecks than traditional web services:

  • Latency: LLM inference is slow (seconds, not milliseconds)
  • Token limits: Context windows constrain input/output sizes
  • Cost: Each API call can cost dollars, not cents
  • Rate limits: Providers enforce strict rate limits
  • Non-determinism: Same input can produce different outputs

Architecture Patterns for Scale

Async Processing

Most LLM operations should be async:

  • Accept requests immediately, return job ID
  • Process in background workers
  • Notify client via webhook or polling
  • Store results for retrieval

This prevents request timeouts and allows better resource utilization.

Request Queuing

Use message queues (Redis, RabbitMQ, SQS) to:

  • Buffer requests during peak loads
  • Prioritize urgent requests
  • Distribute work across workers
  • Implement rate limiting per user/model

Caching Strategies

Cache LLM outputs based on input hash:

  • Use Redis or similar for fast lookups
  • Cache key = hash(prompt + model + temperature)
  • Set TTL based on data freshness requirements
  • Invalidate cache when models update

Can reduce costs by 50-90% for repeated queries.

Model Selection and Routing

Model Tiers

Use different models for different complexity levels:

  • Tier 1 (fast/cheap): Simple classifications, keyword extraction (GPT-3.5, smaller fine-tuned models)
  • Tier 2 (balanced): Most extraction tasks, moderate reasoning (GPT-4-turbo, Claude Haiku)
  • Tier 3 (powerful/expensive): Complex reasoning, critical tasks (GPT-4, Claude Opus)

Optimizing Token Usage

Reduce prompt size without losing information:

  • Remove unnecessary instructions
  • Summarize conversation history instead of including full context
  • Use structured formats (JSON) instead of natural language where possible
  • Extract only relevant document sections for RAG

Handling Rate Limits

LLM providers enforce rate limits. Strategies:

  • Exponential backoff: Retry with increasing delays
  • Multiple API keys: Rotate keys across requests (if allowed)
  • Fallback models: Switch to alternative providers when rate limited

Monitoring and Observability

Track key metrics:

  • Latency: p50, p95, p99 response times
  • Cost: Token usage, API costs per request/user
  • Quality: Success rates, error rates, accuracy metrics
  • Throughput: Requests per second, queue depth

Conclusion

Scaling LLM systems requires different thinking than traditional services. Focus on async processing, aggressive caching, intelligent model routing, and comprehensive monitoring. Most importantly, design for cost from the beginning—LLM costs can spiral quickly without proper controls.